Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User css-N




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. harej 00:19, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

Template:User css-N
Transferring nomination incorrectly placed at Templates for discussion/Log/2010 January 24. Userboxes are supposed to be discussed at MFD. Comments already made in the TFD discussion, including the original nomination statement by, are reproduced below. RL0919 (talk) 00:34, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Meaningless and unnecessary —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:19, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: The meaning is quite clear, the user has a great understanding of Cascading Style Sheets. Dread Lord CyberSkull ✎☠ 16:27, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment No one is a native speaker of a programming language. This can be collapsed to css-4 or css-5 —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Addendum In fact, the user category for this template is the css-4 user category. This is entirely redundant. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Again -- "meaningless and unnecessary" applies to a great many userboxes, and is not generally claimed as a reason for deletion. Smile.  Collect (talk) 13:38, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Editors matter. "While "it's harmless" is certainly not a valid reason for keeping encyclopedic content (such as articles, templates and images) which does not meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, it is a perfectly valid argument when applied to the Wikipedia namespace and to userspace." -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 13:56, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Template:User css-4 or Template:User css-5. As the nom notes, "no one is a native speaker of a programming language". I don't see how the essay Editors matter applies in this case... will anyone who uses this template be made unhappy (or even notice) if it is replaced by the level-4 or level-5 template, especially if their userpages are not edited (i.e., if the template is redirected). –Black Falcon (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.