Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User mm

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  REDIRECT to User my  No  unique  names  15:27, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Template:User mm


Unused, malformed, miscategorized Babel template which is superseded. —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:54, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Superceded by what? Redirect to the answer.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:23, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Burmese is an important Southeast Asian language. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 21:13, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Response But there are functional and well-formed templates for Burmese and this one isn't used anyway. Why would we keep this one? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:51, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
 * To conform to standard. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 02:18, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Response What standard? What do you mean...? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:07, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Well, we have User en and User de, etc. So why wouldn't we keep this template? - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 10:59, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Response Because user my is what it is supposed to be (and that template exists and is used.) —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 10:40, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to user my; this name isn't hurting anything. Nyttend (talk) 18:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Response Why would this redirect to  and why keep it at all when it's unused anyway? —Justin ( koavf ) ❤T☮C☺M☯ 09:46, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Because it's obviously being used as an alternate name thereof. We shouldn't permit it to be freestanding, since it's erroneous, but because it's more than 4½ years old, it's likely gotten a bit of use.  We shouldn't outright delete it and thus make it appear as if all of these people added nonexistent templates to their userpages when it's quite obvious that they were adding something with the message of user my to their userpages.  Bottom line: it's not hurting anything, and deletion would be marginally negative.  Nyttend (talk) 18:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)