Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User reverted by Jimbo

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) ltbdl (talk) 15:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)

Template:User reverted by Jimbo

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

not much use for this. template remains unused on what seems to be any page. Dawnbails (talk) 02:43, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment This template is actually pretty funny and lighthearted. Its a shame that it can't be reworded somehow in order to be useful as something funny and relatable. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 16:16, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't be opposed for at least userifying it, but the template has remained almost* completely unused in the 13 years it has existed as a template. Dawnbails (talk) 23:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Used presumably by substitution: User:Iridescent/Barnstars, User talk:Balloonman/archive 20 /these weren't substitutions/ User talk:Cla68/Holding area.—Alalch E. 23:21, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This is the second MfD for this template. It was kept in 2021: Miscellany for deletion/Unused Userboxes—Alalch E. 23:32, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep per that MfD. This template was based on this edit, which referred to this other edit by Jimbo, which removed a link to an unedited murder video.  — Jeff G. ツ 09:47, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Meh. May as well keep it. Edward-Woodrow :) [ talk ] 14:35, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.