Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Template:User wikipedia/ToiletUser

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: Userfy. — xaosflux  Talk 01:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Template:User wikipedia/ToiletUser


Producal filling to MfD: This template is about userbox, so I moved from WP:TfD to here. The following text was copied from WP:TfD: Hhkohh (talk) 10:09, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Useless single transclusion (by creator) template. –Ammarpad (talk) 16:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete. --Izno (talk) 12:36, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - sense of humour failure by nom. Bazonka (talk) 12:42, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete has nothing to do with building Wikipedia Legacypac (talk)
 * Keep (or userfy per Godsy) - harmless. I have a number of userboxes I created that are only displayed on my own userpages, they contribute nothing to "building Wikipedia", but since when is that a requirement? They're not doing any harm, leave them alone. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 16:00, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy to User:Bazonka/ToiletUser per Userbox migration. This is sometimes appropriate, especially when userboxes have only one or two transclusions and have existed quite a while. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 20:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Userfy per . —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:25, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - Has nothing to do with unbuilding Wikipedia (only unbuilding the editor). Robert McClenon (talk) 19:23, 18 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.