Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Tikhonov's theorem

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  procedural keep. I have moved the discussion to Articles for deletion/Tikhonov's theorem. Cunard (talk) 01:30, 19 July 2011 (UTC)

Tikhonov's theorem


Only 3 links; one is red and according to the deletion log has never existed (the dab page was created in 2009). This can be adequately addressed with distinguish on one page and redirect on the other. A dab page is unnecessary. Hairy Dude (talk) 02:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Why's this on MfD and not AfD? Nevertheless, the rationale is valid; dab pages for only two entries are always pointless, as getting to the "correct" page always takes exactly as many steps in the worst case with two hatnotes as it does with a dab, and in the former case over 50% of readers should have no additional steps to take. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 09:25, 15 July 2011 (UTC)


 * G6 agreed, the names are disparate enough that distinguish is all you need. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 16:23, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * keep, speedy declined. Does not meet speedy criterion. Perhaps we should have an entry for the missing item. Red links are good. Anyone looking for it or any of the theorems would come here, and might well known enough to write it.   DGG ( talk ) 16:59, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * That is not an argument based on the deletion guidelines, nor one helpful to our readers (who outnumber our editors by several orders of magnitude). If the article is written the dab page can be trivially reinstated. Until then it is actively hindering readers. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 20:43, 15 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Move this listing to AfD. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.