Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/TimedText:Depeche mode pipeline.ogg.en.srt

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep for now, as said he will work on this, without prejudice for renomination if it remains abandoned for a reasonable time. — xaosflux  Talk 15:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

TimedText:Depeche mode pipeline.ogg.en.srt


Malformatted and apparently abandoned subtitles page. There wouldn't be anything particularly useful here for someone redoing the subtitles, because you'd need to listen it over from the start to get the timestamps right anyway. --ais523(UTC) 17:59, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment I didn't inform the page creator because they apparently have a standing request not to be informed about upload deletions (which probably includes TimedText-space, it's pretty similar to File). However, I'm going to mention their username here: User:Epolk: because it feels wrong to me not to at least give them a notification. --ais523 18:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and fix it - We don't delete stuff on the sole basis that it currently doesn't work, we just have to fix it. I will if I have the time this weekend. TimedText syntax can be tricky, I agree, but the ultimate goal would be to have TimedText attachments for every audio and video file, so we shouldn't be deleting them (barring actual abuse or disruption). ☺ ·  Salvidrim!   ·  &#9993;  21:22, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Normally, I'd agree, but this is basically the TimedText equivalent of a WP:CSD; it's so un-started that working from the existing page wouldn't really give an advantage over starting from a blank page. And although it'd be better complete than deleted, it can be completed just as well even if it's deleted (I wouldn't expect CSD G4 to apply here); and in its current state, it's just adding extra confusion. --ais523 21:39, 24 October 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.