Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ÆE/Paul Pantone

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was gone care of. — This, that and the other (talk) 12:16, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

User:ÆE/Paul Pantone


WP:FAKEARTICLE since May 2010.  Neil N   talk to me  17:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sourcing is highly questionable, and looks insufficient to ever establish notability. There are also WP:BLP issues as I see it, given the subject's troubled history. AndyTheGrump (talk) 17:54, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - not only a fake article, but a stale fake article pushing a fringe theory via a non-notable fringe theorist's unsourced claims. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  18:43, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fake article... Actually, it seems to be an attempt to improperly "resurect" an article from deletion (see: Articles for deletion/Paul Pantone) through self-userfication. The creator (User:ÆE) seems to have been a single purpose account created solely to "userfy" the article.   Note... see also: User:Ikip/Paul Pantone... this seems to be a pattern that may require admin action.  Blueboar (talk) 20:34, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete abandoned draft of a potential WP:BLP nightmare. Someone not using his real name (talk) 21:07, 1 August 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.