Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Nearly the entirety of this userpage is political userboxes bar a couple of Wiki-related ones at the top, and the revision logs of this page show that increasingly inflammatory userboxes are the only thing this user has ever added to this page. Many of these userboxes are currently nominated for deletion, some of them were recently deleted for genocide denial, and many of the others likely wouldn't survive a deletion discussion themselves. Pretty extreme case of WP:UP.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 22:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * comment for reference: https://xtools.wmflabs.org/ec-namespacetotals/en.wikipedia.org/%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C%20%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB%20%D0%97%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B9%20%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80 Dronebogus (talk) 22:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * As a personal aside, this user’s philosophy is also fairly incoherent. I mean, how can you be a socialist and an objectivist (Randian) at the same time? Dronebogus (talk) 05:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * comment I’ve nominated several of their userboxes for deletion as minimally used and politically inflammatory. Dronebogus (talk) 05:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep : Not offensive enough to justify users policing other users' user pages. SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Lean Delete userpage and all subpages, on the basis of of not being a contributor, but being here to inject political discord. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 03:17, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Noting that I'd call support for the Soviet invasion of the Baltics, Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia and that somehow the German unification was an occupation as certainly inappropriate. Super   Ψ   Dro  19:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * weak delete clearly a case of WP:NOTHERE (user does a few minor edits to communism/socialism articles, creates a bunch of fringey, tankie-y political userboxen, then never comes back) but this is still WP:RAGPICKING. I wouldn’t mind seeing this deleted but it’s not really a big deal either way. Dronebogus (talk) 06:10, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Is he WP:NOTHERE?
 * He has 34 mainspace edits. Checking them. He adds a flag to communism related articles.  Looking ...
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&offset=&limit=100&target=%D0%9F%D0%BE%D0%BB%D1%8C+%D0%9A%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%BB+%D0%97%D0%BB%D0%BE%D0%B9+%D0%94%D0%B8%D0%BA%D1%82%D0%B0%D1%82%D0%BE%D1%80&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end=
 * everyone one of them were reverted.
 * Looking further, edits to those pages around the same time involve other WP:SPAs doing similar edits.
 * I thing that all of the user's subpages (see here)
 * are eligible for deletion under CSD#U5. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I wouldn’t support that per arguments explained at User:Dronebogus/Unpersoning, but yeah they definitely weren’t here to be of any use to anyone. Dronebogus (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I only nominated the userboxes by them I found overtly inflammatory or otherwise bizarre and fringey Dronebogus (talk) 21:54, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * "overtly inflammatory" is definitely a good reason to delete. "otherwise bizarre and fringey" is definitely not a good reason to delete stuff from users' userpages.
 * I think it is not helpful to conflate "overtly inflammatory" with "otherwise bizarre and fringey". One's userpage is an appropriate place to put your possible bizarre and fringey ideas.
 * On balance, I think this userpage is easily OK. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I nominated the “bizarre fringe” ones because nobody is likely to use them except Randies, wp:lunatic charlatans and other wp:nothere types. Dronebogus (talk) 04:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Your "Unpersoning" essay is quite good and agreeable to me, but it doesn't speak to the rule that userpace content must be limited in proportion to their project contributions. With their every mainspace edit reverted, and nothing else being a contribution to the project, I think his userspace is entirely deleteable per U5, with no conflict with your "Unpersoning" essay. SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * So, I have had a good look at this user's subpages . No, U5 does not apply, because the user intended them to be a contribution to the project, as much as some can argue that they are not a net positive contribution.  -- SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Strong support per WP:NOTHERE and WP:NOTANKIES. Super   Ψ   Dro  19:38, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * You can’t vote twice. Dronebogus (talk) 04:46, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I believe this was their first !vote in this nomination?  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 05:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Oh sorry, I mistook smokeyjoe’s vote for theirs. Dronebogus (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The user has far too many userboxes on their page, but the quantity of userboxes is their perogative. If there are userboxes that violate WP:UBX, then those userboxes should sent to WP:MFD. Deleting the page onto which many templates transclude seems like the wrong way to go about this, especially since the vast majority of the userboxes are perfectly benign. — Mhawk10 (talk) 00:13, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, as well as (most) subpages. Obviously not a contributor, having in mind the number of mainspace edits (all of them reverted), and the fact that the last edit was made in late 2020. —Sundostund (talk) 17:25, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete per nomination and that WP:NOTHERE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr Reading Turtle (talk • contribs) 12:58, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.