Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/ProFidel

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/ProFidel

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per reasoning at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/Baltics; Wikipedia isn’t a place for tankies to promote historical revisionism. Dronebogus (talk) 06:01, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak keep I'd have an easy time !voting to keep it if it was simply "This user is interested in the Cuban Revolution" or even "This user supports the Cuban Revolution", but the wording here is just a bit too propagandistic with its title of "ProFidel" and its wording of "in its fight against imperialism." I don't know if I have as easy of a time !voting to delete it, though. At least expressing support for a revolution isn't as intuitively gross as expressing support for an invasion.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 20:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I thought the same thing. The Cuban Revolution can still be seen as a noble effort even if Castro didn’t exactly live up to his ideals. Dronebogus (talk) 21:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep because I oppose censorship. SK2242 (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The "in its fight against imperialism." part should be deleted. Then we may keep the userbox. Super   Ψ   Dro  19:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The box probably needs to be renamed as well. Dronebogus (talk) 10:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete, as didn't the Cuban Revolution already happen? - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The box is ostensibly stating the Revolution was a positive event, or at least noble in spirit, but based on the contributor’s behavior the message is more likely “Castro did nothing wrong” Dronebogus (talk) 03:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't think this is enough of a WP:UBCR violation to justify deletion. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep per SK2242. ToeSchmoker (talk) 21:53, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. The userbox does appear to promote historical revisionism, which is one of the favorite activities of its creator. —Sundostund (talk) 13:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.