Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/Restoration of socialism

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/Restoration of socialism

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Per reasoning at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Поль Крол Злой Диктатор/Userboxes/Baltics; Wikipedia isn’t a place for tankies to promote historical revisionism. Dronebogus (talk) 06:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete Weaker because this one can at least theoretically be interpreted to mean that they want socialism to return through peaceful means, but leaning towards delete because their decision to focus on "all countries where it was overthrown in the 1980s and 90s" strongly suggests that the intended reading of this userbox is that Russia should get its sphere of influence back, so this is Russian irredentist propaganda and not just expressing some economic opinion.  Vanilla  Wizard  💙 20:25, 3 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep because I oppose censorship. SK2242 (talk) 09:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Russian irredentism is highly divisive, especially since they've recently done a thing, which has driven people who didn't even know what irredentism was before the war to take a strong opinion on the topic. Divisive userboxes are banned under the Userbox policy. ☢️Plutonical☢️  ᶜᵒᵐᵐᵘⁿᶦᶜᵃᵗᶦᵒⁿˢ  14:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete I agree with everything Vanilla Wizard said. Super   Ψ   Dro  19:04, 4 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per Vanilla Wizard. -- Lenticel ( talk ) 00:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Weak delete per everyone else. Scorpions13256 (talk) 02:03, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia is not a soapbox for historical revisionism. But this userbox doesn't really do that; nobody denies that the Communism was overthrown in Eastern Europe during the Fall of Communism. That the user believes that the countries would be better off under Communism is a minority view in all of those countries except for Russia (and maybe Belarus, for which I can't find recent data), but I really don't see how this is more inflammatory or intrinsically divisive than a userbox that says that a user supports a one-state (or a two-state) solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, neither of which seem to pass the threshold of being too divisive to have on a userpage. — Mhawk10 (talk) 00:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination and Vanilla Wizard. —Sundostund (talk) 21:35, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.