Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:تهران

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 12:27, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

User:تهران
WP:SOAPBOX, WP:NOTNEWS Access Denied  [FATAL ERROR] 05:22, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete obviously, per nom. -- Jayron  32  05:56, 28 October 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Does not attack anyone on WP - and expresses views pertinent to understanding the editor. Valid use in userspace. Collect (talk) 10:20, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a soapbox. Chase me ladies, I&#39;m the Cavalry (talk) 18:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep within the lines of of acceptable use for statement of views and such. I a little bold in its statements but not quite to Soapbox levels The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 19:25, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: Definite infraction of WP:SOAPBOX.— Ryūlóng ( 竜龙 ) 21:03, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, agree this is soapboxing. StrPby (talk) 23:34, 28 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. MER-C 07:44, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Per WP:NOTNEWS and WP:SOAPBOX, as above. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 13:26, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Alright, the death to Israel statement obviously makes you want to say delete, but the user is active at Portal:Current events (aka "news") and the rest of their userpage looks like it's used to organize links to media sources. The statement at the top might not even be soapboxing because it's a notable quote, not a personal endorsement of a viewpoint, though, I'm sure common sense can be used to remove it if necessary. WP:NOTNEWS doesn't really apply in this instance, either, if it's being used to save information related to what the user does on wikipedia. Swarm Talk 06:27, 31 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: relates very much to what the user does on Wikipedia. That's what userspace is for. Buddy431 (talk) 19:58, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per Swarm, as the "death to Israel statement" is in violation of WP:SOAPBOX. However useful contribs this user might have had, this deletion is based on the userpage and not necessarily an attack on the editor himself/herself. :| TelCo  NaSp  Ve :|  06:54, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:SOAPBOX. Having read the quotes and other text on the page, I agree with those who support deletion that this has crossed the line from acceptable use of userspace into having the semblance of soapboxing. Cunard (talk) 08:01, 3 November 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.