Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:夏威夷没有眼泪

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  07:18, 12 June 2023 (UTC)

User:夏威夷没有眼泪

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Single-purpose account. Promoting nonsense pro-Beijing political propaganda. See also Wikipedia:Miscellany_for_deletion/User:残花月. 虹易 (talk) 03:01, 25 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete we do not need propaganda user pages. Catfurball (talk) 18:17, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Question for User:Catfurball - Were you able either to translate it or to machine-translate it? Do you know that it is propaganda?  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep at this point - I was unable to machine-translate the page, so that it has no meaning at all to an Anglophone who does not read Chinese.
 * Comment - I think, as idle suspicion, that all of these accounts, except of course the nominator, are the same person, but the CheckUser data has expired, and requesting a behavioral comparison would be a diversion of human resources that can be better used. If the pattern of posting of Chinese chatter resumes, either file a sockpuppet investigation, or don't file an SPI.  Robert McClenon (talk) 17:21, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I did open a SPI. I suppose they wouldn't be active as long as these pages are still there. --虹易 (talk) 01:32, 30 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Comment: My machine translation returned Under the impact of the epidemic, the "hostility" of the United States to the outside world has increased, and the rise of emerging countries has made the West feel conflicted and uneasy. It is not only afraid of losing the bonus of rules, but also worried that its own value system will be subverted. Public opinion is unwilling to admit the reality, insists on nitpicking, and repeatedly questions the brevity and accuracy of China's disclosure of information. In the final analysis, it is a reflection of anxiety. C LYDE TALK TO ME/STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 17:54, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete as a useless propaganda work. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 20:07, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.