Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:虞海/Sandbox/Talk:Human rights in Arunachal Pradesh or South Tibet and Tawang, as well as human rights of Tibetan people in India

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 22:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

User:虞海/Sandbox/Talk:Human rights in Arunachal Pradesh or South Tibet and Tawang, as well as human rights of Tibetan people in India


This one took a moment to figure out. Near as I can tell, it was the talk page of an article and this user moved it into their userspace when the article was deleted. The article itself does not appear to have ever been userfied. I was tempted to just speedy delete it under WP:CSD as a page dependent on a deleted page, bit since I particpated in the discussion they might be inappropriate so bringing it here for the community to decide. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:28, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - how in the hell did you find this page after all this time?Moxy (talk) 21:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I was looking for something else in the ancient history of my talk page archives and stumbled across a link to it. I couldn't remeber what all the fuss was about and clicked on the link, and here we are. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete per Articles for deletion/Human rights in South Tibet and Tawang, as well as human rights of Tibetan people in India. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. This talk page of a deleted page should not be saved in userspace. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete no apparent value, esp. considering SmokeyJoe's link. 199.203.51.242 (talk) 09:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete per Metropolitan90. I don't think WP:UP specifically addresses this situation, but it raises attribution issues. Also, I think user page archives of WP:G8 talk pages with no corresponding subject page would seem to fall under G8 as well. If not, it is a G8 loop hole that could be used to game the system. This situation doesn't come up that often, so there's probably no need to revise any policy or guideline and regular delete, rather than speedy delete, is fine in this situation since we already have a MfD discussion going on the page. -- Uzma Gamal (talk) 15:30, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.