Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:18danielm/sandbox/Donald Braman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep. (non-admin closure) power~enwiki ( π, ν ) 23:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

User:18danielm/sandbox/Donald Braman

 * – (View MfD)

Not Notable. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 20:56, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Alleged lack of notability, like lack of context, is not a valid reason for deletion at the draft state. The editor is entitled to attempt to create a valid article, as long as this ius being done i9n good faith. Frankly there isn't enough context here yet to determine if this person is or is not notable, all that we can say is that notability has not yet been demonstrated, nor indeed asserted. See WP:DEMOLISH. Such nominations are improper. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 21:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep nothing to see here. Sandboxes are for playing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lightburst (talk • contribs) 22:31, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep WP:SK#1. Notability on its own is not a deletion reason either in userspace or draftspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:43, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Neutral - Doesn't need deleting, and we don't need one-liners. Robert McClenon (talk) 22:13, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy (TALK CONT ) 12:03, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.