Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:209.178.175.191/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. Salvio Let's talk about it! 11:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

User:209.178.175.191/sandbox


This IP hasn't edited since 2005 and an IP should not have a userpage like this anyway. Especially one called sandbox in a subpage as it is. Kumioko (talk) 01:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge to Sandbox :) Bulwersator (talk) 08:04, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Acather96 (talk) 10:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete due to lack of activity. However, I dispute that IP's should not have user pages (See WP:HUMAN). Also, is there any reason why you could not have simply blanked the page yourself rather than raised an MfD? --Surturz (talk) 14:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Well no not a huge reason but I see no need to treat this anydifferently than another trash page. If it has no value to the encyclopedia (and clearly this user has long abandoned this page) then we should get rid of it rather than blank it. Thats just my opinion though. --Kumioko (talk) 20:24, 12 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete There are a number of good IP editors, their contributions should not be discounted because they don't have a "registered" account. At any rate, unused/edited pages shouldn't be kept around forever as per WP:NOTWEBHOST.     ArcAngel   (talk) ) 15:26, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOTWEBHOST, has been abandoned for ages. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 18:33, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per above — except I don't agree with "an IP should not have a userpage like this anyway." Dynamic&#124;cimanyD contact me ⁞ my edits 16:05, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Mainly per WP:NOTWEBHOST, and because the IP has not edited since 2005. — mc10 ( t / c ) 04:51, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete, but purely per NOTWEBHOST. Policy doesn't prohibit IPs from having a userspace.  Nyttend (talk) 04:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.