Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:21655 Secret page game


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete (user request&mdash;U1). Ruslik (talk) 11:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

user:21655/TSSCSET!/GO!
Inappropriate use of userspace. Wikipedia is not myspace. TSSCSET stands for "The Secret Subpage Contest Sweepstakes Extraordinarie Thingydiddly!" according to 21655's userpage. -- DFS454 (talk) 09:55, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

This includes the following pages:

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Final Stage

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Nope2

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Stage 2

User:21655/TSSCSET!/You win!

User:21655/TSSCSET!/The Star

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Nope4

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Nope

User:21655/TSSCSET!

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Stage 3

User:21655/TSSCSET!/Nope3


 * Delete all per nom. No encyclopedic value for any "secret page" nonsense. Jclemens (talk) 16:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete all per others. Wikipedia is not the place for "secret page" games. Versus22 talk 18:10, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete U1 Speedy Too busy to award anybody who finishes it anyway. Besides, I don't remember getting any memos regarding secret page games.  21655  ταλκ / 01ҁ 21:01, 12 March 2009 (UTC)
 * See this. There's also an ARB case about this going on right now. --DFS454 (talk) 22:09, 12 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep. This is a longstanding editor with many serious contributions.  His contributions are easily worth more than the cost of allowing his games, and if these games help keep such an editor around, they are a good thing.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:29, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment From the policy :The focus of user pages should not be social networking, but rather providing a foundation for effective collaboration.
 * Doesn't matter if you are an admin,vandal or a rollbacker - policy applies to everyone. Besides, look at the comment above you, the author is requesting deletion.--DFS454 (talk) 13:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * We give wide lattitute in userspace to productive contributors. Interactive games, among contributors, do have value in supporting effective collaboration, and other learning benefits.  If the author requests deletion, then it will be delete due to his request.  But if user wanted to keep these pages, we should let him.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete all - silly waste of time, and the author has commented above saying he doesn't object to deletion anyway. Robofish (talk) 18:32, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.