Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:7RobertLincoln7

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  speedy keep. Withdrawal as insufficiently disruptive, time wasting, and an error in judgment. (non-admin closure) Dronebogus (talk) 08:56, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

User:7RobertLincoln7

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Another ragpicking one, but this user made literally two edits and both were to this page, which at the very top is being used for evangelization which I’m pretty sure is against the rules. Dronebogus (talk) 08:40, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. —  Sundostund  mppria  (talk / contribs) 15:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - Huh? So they make two edits to their userpage and because they, what, included their religion and political persuasion it violates some rule? I see nothing wrong with this at all. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 15:22, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, that's against several Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Please read WP:SOAPBOX, WP:NOTWEBHOST, WP:NOTHERE, or WP:UPNOT. Take your pick. Any one of them warrants removal, let alone all of them. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not. It's standard userpage fare, and we often encourage new users to begin editing with their own userpage. The only people who will ever see this are people looking for busywork to do in other people's user pages (and anyone whose time is wasted when they're nominated for deletion). Nearly all of this page is userboxes. If the userboxes aren't appropriate to include on a userpage, nominate the userboxes. Right now this is ["I'm a fundamentalist" + a bunch of stuff that appears on many people's user pages]. The big crime here is being a new user who edited a userpage before editing articles (which is actually completely ok). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 16:59, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Blank as inappropriate user page. Though I would like to express my concern that these nominations seem only to be targeting conservative/Christian pages. While those should absolutely be removed, MfD should not be used to target specific beliefs. All userspace pages that express advocacy should be removed to maintain the project's integrity. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 16:10, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree but at the moment I haven’t seen any communist screeds Dronebogus (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: I don't see the point in this one. At worst blank, but if you're gonna ragpick userpages, at least stick to blatant cases. Curbon7 (talk) 18:21, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Unnecessarily (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep You're admitting this is ragpicking but don't see how pointless this is? This page is doing no harm, leave it be. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 05:24, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.