Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:90/LIFE

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  no consensus. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 06:23, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

User:90/LIFE

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;
 * Tol (talk &#124; contribs) @ 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

I think it was determined at some point that opposing abortion even when it means the mother is likely to be killed by not aborting the pregnancy is decidedly extremist. Dronebogus (talk) 12:33, 30 November 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tol  (talk &#124; contribs) @ 20:38, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Not an unreasonable prolife position. “Risk” is a pretty broad term that includes risk levels far below “likely to be killed”. SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:35, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
 * it doesn’t state “even if there’s a small possibility of the mother’s death”, it says “even if the mother’s life is at risk”, which incorporates ALL levels of risk. That inherently includes “likely to be killed”. It’s simple logic. In general if one does not clarify a hardline political position it’s arguably more reasonable to assume it’s extremist. Plus if you’re using aggressive “no exceptions” type wording you’re probably trying to be inflammatory and soapboxy, which is against WP:USERBOX. Dronebogus (talk) 10:31, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Your logic is not simple logic. Your logic is one way of reading it, but not the only way. SmokeyJoe (talk) 11:11, 8 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm unclear why any userboxes, regardless of what they say, should not be deleted. However, I'm willing to listen and understand what use they have in improving the project, it seems that they just take up space, which costs money for server space. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 05:02, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The idea that “deletion clears up space” is largely a myth. Deletion on WP is actually just removal from public view. Thus arguing that something needs to be deleted to save memory space like an old unplayed game on your computer is not a good idea. That’s a technical issue for the Foundation to deal with. Instead, you should argue to keep, delete etc. based on policy. Dronebogus (talk) 06:55, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * If it doesn't save any space, that's fine. I would still voice the opinion that this should be deleted unless I see how it improves the encyclopedia somehow. People can put their "flair" on social media. It doesn't seem to serve a purpose here. Royal Autumn Crest (talk) 11:52, 9 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. I do not believe that this userbox violates WP:UBCR, so I cannot support deleting it, regardless of how some people might feel about what it says. --Zander251 (talk) 06:04, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.