Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AKIYAMA.AYA/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. , if you want to move this to draftspace, you are welcome to do so and I am happy to assist you if you need a hand doing that. But if not, please feel free to leave this in your userspace and work on it at your own pace. If you need a hand with anything else, please feel free to reach out to me or any of the other participants here and I'm sure we would be happy to answer any questions. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 19:46, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

User:AKIYAMA.AYA/sandbox


Main focus of the article is not clear, don't think it follows Notability or will ever be able to. Simranpreet singh (talk) 11:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft:Online shopping in Japan; do not delete. The draft and editor account are brand-new, the topic seems plausible, and while the existing version is not close to ready for mainspace, draft space is a great location for this new editor to work at learning how to create a mainspace-ready article. Draft space is the preferred location for AfC submissions. submission of a draft (or sandbox) to MfD should be a rare case. In particular, per WP:NMFD notability does not apply to drafts. Please also review WP:BITE. VQuakr (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Hey VQuakr, I apologies if it looked like I am biting someone, though, I didn't intend to harm, but help. I think the topic is not encyclopedic as most of the data would depend on information about online shopping websites rather than particularly on the topic. Talking about Notability, I believe, the topic won't be able to get reliable sources with full coverage (it may get some mentions in news, but that, probably, would not be enough). Also, thanks for WP:NMFD, I had no idea of it. I'll try to put some strong points in MfDs from now. Thank you! Simranpreet singh (talk) 14:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I think there is plenty of RS info available to create an article on this topic, ie (likely more written in Japanese). VQuakr (talk) 16:00, 14 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete most of the page was dropped in a single edit complete with section headings pasted in as plain text. It's article directory style filler content for link building. The kind of spun content people add their target link to and post on an article directory site. It's just junk. Legacypac (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

regarding the topic, I guess it's an important topic. online shopping is becoming a lifestyle for Japanese people. One of the reasons is the ageing society, which is a really big issue, not only in Japan, but in many developed counties too. perhaps I could't clearly show the main purpose of my article. anyway, it is my first, and I will do my best editing the article. Regarding the style, yes I understand that it's poorly written, specially that it doesn't include subtitles. The reason is that I started using Wikipedia recently, and I'm still learning how to create an article. So all I'm asking is to be little patient for new Wikipedia users and give them some encouragement to proceed. (AKIYAMA.AYA (talk) 02:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC))
 * keep for editing to Draft:Online shopping in Japan;Thank you so much for all your comments, although some of them are harsh.
 * Keep, apologize to the editor, and give them some assistance.  DGG ( talk ) 00:27, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - This is a good faith draft article in the the user's own sandbox. This is perfectly in line with the purpose of user pages.  The editor may wish to move this to draft space, but thee is no requirement to do so and they are free to continue to work on their draft in the their sandbox. -- Whpq (talk) 13:55, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.