Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:ALombardoIII/sandbox/Master's in Public Administration at Seton Hall University

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 20:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

User:ALombardoIII/sandbox/Master's in Public Administration at Seton Hall University


Wikipedia is not a college catalog Legacypac (talk) 06:29, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. WP:GNG does not apply in user space. Or are you asserting WP:COPYVIO?Newimpartial (talk) 12:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I never said it failed to meet GNG, though it does. Can I suggest kindly you learn some policy before continuing to oppose my nominations enmass. This is a WP:NOT violation. Might well be copy vio too, cause it reads like a college catalog. Legacypac (talk) 12:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * It reads as though someone was actually working on an article and paraphrasing content as they went. That is not a violation of WP:NOT, though of course it would be a violation if submitted to article space before the process is completed.
 * I read the relevant policies before opposing any nominations, and I am agreeing with your nominations where they follow policy (and not opposing them when I am not sure). If you stop making nominations that violate the WP:CONSENSUS of WP:STALE, you won't see me opposing any. :) Newimpartial (talk) 12:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

I suggest reviewing WP:UP and especially "Extensive writings and material on topics having virtually no chance whatsoever of being directly useful to the project, its community, or an encyclopedia article." You might also look at WP:UP in relation to usernames that look like article titles. Legacypac (talk) 13:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Wherever these policies about usernames might be, they are not in WP:UP and don't appear to be grounds for article deletion. And the key word in the WP:UP policy you cite is "extensive". Are you seriously suggesting that any of the pages you have MfD-nominated, in the last few days represents "extensive" writings on anything? Newimpartial (talk) 13:32, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Newimpartial - read them again. What kind of user page looks most like an article? One that has an article type name in the heading like User: Widgets followed by an article about widgets. Extensive does not need to ns a whole book, extensive can be a few lines when those lines are the entire page. Like paragraphs about a WP:GARAGE band. Legacypac (talk) 13:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Your interpretation of WP:FAKEARTICLE is WP:OR rather than actual policy. And "Extensive" is never defined as a proportion of the existing content - if that is what is meant, we use would use a phrase in English like "composed mostly of". "Extensive" is a word referring to a volume of content, presumably to single out a kindsof WP:NOTWEBHOST violation that is particularly problematic. Newimpartial (talk) 13:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. inappropriate use of user space for something which will never conceivably make an article. I would have considered this for speedy deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete This is a college catalog of a degree program. WP:NOT applies here, specifically WP:NOTWEBHOST. &mdash; Myk Streja Talk to me 07:11, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.