Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AMK152/2000s

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 16:04, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AMK152/2000s


Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, looks like a fork of List of sovereign states in the 2000s. Suggest deletion and that the editor work with others at the mainspace article. Ricky81682 (talk) 22:58, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep and close Actually, it doesn't. It is a draft to make the article into a table, but it should look good, so I create a sandbox to work on so as to test how it could look. It is not complete and I think a half-created table doesn't look good. I did the same thing for the table for Second Lady of the United States at User:AMK152/2ndLady, which took me from July 2011 to February 2013 to complete. Not only that, but the 2nd Ladies table is now a part of the main article. I didn't want the table to be half complete on the article, so I created a sandbox until it was ready. I really don't understand why you are putting these subpages up for deletion instead of asking me about them. You seem to not know the purpose of some of these articles. —  AMK152  (t • c) 00:18, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It wasn't edited for almost four years. If you wanted to insert the table now, there's be four years at editing at the article that would have be redone. Otherwise, you'd have to incorporate four years of editing into this table before inserting it in. Also, I don't see a single comment by you at Talk:List_of_sovereign_states_in_the_2000s so that other would know what you're doing. What is you plan, at some point in the future, adding a table in and saying "here's the text from 2010, let's go re-do years of the contents now"? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:04, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * What you are describing could be done with template:inuse. Put up that template and work on the article. It took you a very little bit over a day to finish it and then it sat there for years. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:07, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * It's not yet finished. It still needs work. —  AMK152  (t • c) 02:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * And yes, it is years old, but it took me almost two years to complete the table for the Second Ladies of the United States article. —  AMK152  (t • c) 02:17, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I'll withdraw this. - Ricky81682 (talk) 08:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.