Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AMK152/2ndLady

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep. — xaosflux  Talk 16:05, 27 December 2014 (UTC)

User:AMK152/2ndLady


Per WP:FAKEARTICLE, looks like to the editor's alternative version of Second_Lady_of_the_United_States. WP:BLP concerns as well since no sources are provided. Ricky81682 (talk) 23:01, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Comment: Although this and the following nominations are obviously in good faith, I note that AMK152 is still an active editor. It is good practice to discuss concerns about an editor's userspace pages with that editor before nominating them for deletion. Newyorkbrad (talk) 00:20, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Thank-you, Newyorkbrad. —  AMK152  (t • c) 00:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep and close - it is not a WP:FAKEARTICLE. It cannot possibly be an alternative version because it IS the original version of the table that I put together. It contains the edit history of my changes to the chart at Second Lady of the United States. It's not an alternate version. Here is what the article looked like on November 24, 2012. When I completed the table on February 3, 2013, you will notice that I then copied and pasted the content from my subpage to the article, creating this revision from February 3, 2013. The entire history of that change to a table is on that subpage. Please, next time you assume it's a WP:FAKEARTICLE, review the page histories. —  AMK152  (t • c) 00:45, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * So should it be a redirect and history-merged? Ok I see. You were working on a table as part of the article and it's now been merged in. I think our general practice is to merge in the edits but if there's a policy rationale to keep it, I'm fine with that. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:48, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes. Perhaps the closing admin can do this. —  AMK152  (t • c) 02:01, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

I guess I should withdraw this. This history I think references this page which is what's required. - Ricky81682 (talk) 08:17, 22 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.