Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver/Liam (Minister 10)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  nomination withdrawn. Graham 87 09:21, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

User:A Den Jentyl Ettien Avel Dysklyver/Liam (Minister 10)


Userpage of indeffed userpage. Does anyone want this? Should it be moved to draft space? If Dysklyver doesn't try the SO in 6 months, it will be up for U5. Else, neither the blocking admin nor myself can think of any good policy to delete. Thanks L3X1 (distænt write)  20:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I am withdrawing due to my incready lame/nonexistent rationale, and as the current consensus is "merge" that can be done if people want to. L3X1 (distænt write)  00:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Merge any usable content into Draft:Liam Goligher. It'll probably be G13'd in 6-7 months anyway, but meh. --AntiCompositeNumber (Ring me) 21:34, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge into the existing draft, since there's no point in having to. As a note regarding "an indeffed user", who cares? It won't be up for U5 in six months because that's not how U5 works. It's not a draft (i.e. part of the AFC process) so it's not G13-eligible. If you cannot find any policy reason to delete it, then don't delete it. Primefac (talk) 23:25, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Blank with Inactive userpage blanked per nom. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:42, 27 November 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.