Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:A Fellow Editor/Archive/Drmies talk, December 2017

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. I think we can speedy this as an attack page. If we need it for evidence of AFE's misbehavior down the road, an admin can undelete it. For now, it should go. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 06:58, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

User:A Fellow Editor/Archive/Drmies talk, December 2017


This is essentially an attack page that normally is maintained only for a brief period of time to collect evidence for use in another forum, e.g., in this case to WP:ANI to report User:Drmies. A Fellow Editor was also waxing equally "eloquently" at User_talk:Jimbo_Wales. Bbb23 (talk) 22:16, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Effectively an attack page against one of the most respect members of our community after the creator had been told that they were flat out wrong. TonyBallioni (talk) 22:24, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Comment: To me it is evidence that the creator himself is very disruptive and heading for a sanction. For that purpose alone (evidence), it might be worth keeping. If he ever attempted to bring his "case" to a noticeboard, he'd get a boomerang so fast it would shock an Australian. Softlavender (talk) 22:56, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. We have a policy against attack/grudge spaces in user space, and if the editor does go ahead with a formal complaint, it's trivial for them to link to the state of Drmies' user talk when they added the last section there. I am however going to advise them to save their later additions on their own computer. Yngvadottir (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:POLEMIC. A Fellow Editor is welcome to use the page for a brief time to develop a report for WP:ANI or WP:ARC. However, it was clear a week ago that AFE cannot hear advice and the page in question serves no purpose other than to allow AFE to maintain the rage. Johnuniq (talk) 02:14, 13 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.