Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aaabbb11

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Keep. The general consensus is towards keep. However, the concern about a portion of the page is probably better discussed at ANI rather than MFD on a portion of the page or whatever. Ricky81682 (talk) 00:31, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

User:Aaabbb11


The user page is very much like a personal blog that has many materials as described in WP:UP; also it has divisive comments as in WP:UP. STSC (talk) 06:27, 13 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I don't see a serious issue with this page, certainly not to the point of warranting deletion. Most of the content seems related to the user's Wikipedia experience. Newyorkbrad (talk) 22:43, 15 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep user space of active user. --Surturz (talk) 07:05, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
 * We don't keep any user page just because of the user being active. STSC (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment Earlier on, I really didn't give two shits about this userpage (people are free to share what they think, given that it's done in reasonable amounts), but there is a line to be crossed. Just today he's made an edit to his user page which indirectly accuses me of being a useful idiot of the Communist Party of China. He doesn't directly imply any names, but given our earlier interactions (especially at Talk:China), it's clear to me that I'm within his bracket of unsubtle passive-aggressive nudging. Those who have directly worked with me on the enwiki project for some time would know that I'm a right-wing libertarian with some conservative leanings, and I don't really appreciate this kind of jab, especially when I'm being linked to a leftist movement by this editor. It doesn't matter if this page is kept or deleted, but I don't want to put up with this passive shit in the future, and feel that it's important that this page keeps in line with WP:POLEMIC. -- benlisquare T•C•E 03:30, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Take it to WP:ANI, this isn't the correct venue for conflict resolution. --Surturz (talk) 03:48, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * And ANI isn't the place for small petty disputes either. This is a userpage content issue, which makes discussion at MfD only natural; ANI isn't the first go-to place, and should never be the first go-to place. Even the guidelines state not to take things to ANI if other avenues haven't been attempted yet, I think you misinterpret what ANI is for. -- benlisquare T•C•E 03:54, 19 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.