Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aanankhurma/Unsnack

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  10:07, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Aanankhurma/Unsnack

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Stale draft. I don't see any RS after a search and looking through the ref list, the only reliable sources I see in the ref list are not directly related to this topic, but as general refs on snacking, statistics, etc. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs) 18:58, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - but mainly just because it's a minimally changed, unattributed copy of snack. The part that is changed is purely promotional (Unsnack appears to be a brand presented here under the guise of a general topic). So it's possible it could qualify for speedy as such, but meh. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 19:08, 16 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per Rhododendrites. Under more typical circumstances I don't tend to support userspace drafts coming to MfD, but there are copyright issues here, if not quite G12 ones. Vaticidalprophet 07:35, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as work of departed user and as plagiarism. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:38, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete per copyright/attribution issues as mentioned by Rhododendrites. —  csc -1 04:06, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete Probably could have been deleted via CSD G13 instead of being brought here but nevertheless, It's a stale draft with copyvio.--🌀 Locomotive207 - talk  🌀  00:30, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.