Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aarbus/David Soren




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was no consensus. harej 00:37, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

User:Aarbus/David Soren
Odd copy of a real article, created by an editor with only 3 edits, to create this page. Purpose and utility unclear. Jayjg (talk) 17:06, 24 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete after two weeks if the user doesn't return Maybe they wanted to play with wikimarkup and templates in a sandbox, but if they don't come back then we can clean this up for housecleaning. I remove the categories. Miami33139 (talk) 17:34, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just so you're aware, it has already been two weeks since this was created, and the editor has not returned. Jayjg (talk) 17:39, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep Two weeks is not enough to worry about. Many, many editors disappear for that huge length of time.  It is properly labeled as a draft in userspace, and it is reasonable for us to believe that the label is correct.   And reall WP:BITE as well as WP:DEADLINE here. Collect (talk) 18:52, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:UP. Acps110 (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep for now. Talk to user.  Remind nominator to post a note about the mfd on the user's talk page.  If the user doesn't respond, and doesn't address problems, then blank the page.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:19, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep for another two weeks; then blank per User page, but please remember to politely explain the blanking to the user (example comment). I would normally suggest that a seemingly-abandoned draft article in userspace should be given at least three to six months, but I believe that biographies of living people should be allowed less time to linger in userspace. –Black Falcon (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, is this an WP:SPA account? I feel that a strict interpretation of WP:UP would apply in this case under the circumstances.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 21:35, 30 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.