Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abc1045/Lindsey Horvath

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep also blanking, should anyone at all want to work on this, they are welcome to move it to draft and take over. — xaosflux  Talk 02:00, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

User:Abc1045/Lindsey Horvath


Seemingly non-notable for the applicable notability and my searches only found expected mentions at News, Books and browsers, it's unlikely she's notable enough for her own article and this draft has been unused since starting in January 2010. SwisterTwister  talk  07:32, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Looks definitely potentially notable. Promotion abounds, but I immediately see secondary sources discussing this person. Perfectly valid a user subpage. If promotion from userspace is alleged, recommend blanking during periods of inactivity. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:23, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not notable unless this MfD goes keep, at which point we send to mainspace because there are enough Keep votes. Keep and blank are opposite courses of action. Legacypac (talk) 10:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * You are on a drive to empty userspace? It all must go to mainspace, or be deleted, and now.  Oppose time limits on reasonable userspace work.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:00, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
 * it is actually called a drive to clear a backlog of stale drafts in userspace. What is the plan to move this forward then? Legacypac (talk) 19:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * It would be moving forward for you to stop interfering with others' userspace subpages. It is a drive of highly dubious merit, and you don't seem well qualified in determining what pages need action.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:36, 1 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Technically, any edit (including this MFD nomination) removes this from the stale userspace drafts category. As such, if kept, it can just be ignored for at least a year and it'll populate there again for later discussion. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Re "a drive to clear a backlog of stale drafts in userspace", note that the guidelines at the top of this page (MfD) state: "Note that we do not delete user subpages merely to 'clean up' userspace. Please only nominate pages that are problematic under our guidelines." A2soup (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I would urge editors to find something more constructive to do that wasting time trying to remove drafts from userspace. It is not helpful to the project and discourages small-time editors. Also, why would a draft that is kept be automatically be moved to mainspace? That is absolute nonsense. AusLondonder (talk) 02:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Soft delete Five year old article on a local politician which under our current notability guidelines would not qualify. However, the MFD will now create a search item for her name and people can ask for restoration at WP:REFUND if they so wish. Keeping around an unwatched BLP on an active politician is not prudent. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 21:31, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per SmokeyJoe. A2soup (talk) 08:25, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep and move to Draft namespace. The page creator has not edited since January 2010, so a move to Draft namespace would improve chances of this actually being improved. North America1000 09:24, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Let users develop ideas and play around in userspace. It'd necessary to allow development of future articles. WP:TIND. Deleting these is a complete waste of time, they're harmless, it doesn't save any space or anything. 81.108.18.234 (talk) 21:31, 16 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.