Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abhilash Mhaisne/Vitthal Wagh

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. With respect to User:SmokeyJoe's argument, that would be overriding only if a different user created the mainspace article, or if the creator requested a history merge (which they may still do if they happen to notice this). —Cryptic 05:22, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

User:Abhilash Mhaisne/Vitthal Wagh


Old WP:STALE unreferenced BLP (at least no date of death stated) which should be deleted per consensus that these types of pages should not be kept indefinately. Legacypac (talk) 06:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Procedural Keep. You misunderstand the WP:CONSENSUS, my friend. Per WP:STALE, drafts are to be blanked if problematic, and otherwise are not to be deleted because of age or WP:GNG. Newimpartial (talk) 12:24, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stale draft, we are not a webhost for indefinite storage of content. Newimpartial should perhaps refrain from making patronizing suggestions that Legacypac is unfamiliar with policy and consensus. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 11:16, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete per arguments above. Beyond My Ken (talk) 07:23, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Vitthal Wagh. Not stale, but the actual draft-history of the mainspace article.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:13, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.