Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Abstractmindzent/Graffiki

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. MER-C 09:36, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

User:Abstractmindzent/Graffiki


Promotional draft that has been stale for five years. I tried searching for him, but got zero relevant hits other than a twitter feed, which suggests he's highly unlikely to become notable in the future.

Note: This was the subject of a previous AfD and DRV, which closed as "overturn and move to userspace" with no prejudice against renominating at MfD. ~ RobTalk 14:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Speedy delete, so promotional as would require a full rewrite, WP:G11. And trout the people who previously found nothing better to do than waste community time by submitting such junk to each and every (inapplicable) process in existence.  Sandstein   16:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. If the editor returns, they can request restoration. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 17:46, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete The subject of the article will never pass our notability requirements, and if they ever are famous the article will need a complete rewrite. It is pure puffery. HighInBC 18:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. It was completely inappropriate for it to have ever been put in mainspace. Userspace / mfd / old draft battles and games must never justify sullying of mainspace in any way.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep. Editor has been though enough here. Better to improve and mainspace his work than delete it. 166.176.57.211 (talk) 00:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Undisclosed alternate accounts may not participate in project space debates. So, if you do have a regular account you should either disclose it or remove your vote(and my response). If not, then don't worry. HighInBC 00:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete it was only mainspaced to test notability at AfD immediately. Given some user's instance that stale drafts on non-notable topics can't be tested at MfD, that seemed like a reasonable possible solution. Burn it down. Legacypac (talk) 14:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.