Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Access Denied/Template:uw-rmwarning1

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. -- Cirt (talk) 17:13, 14 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Access Denied/Template:uw-rmwarning1
Another inaccurate warning template in user space (see also this one.) 28bytes (talk) 03:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete blocked user. Mono (talk) 03:32, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete misrepresents policy to the point where it would be eligible for T2 if it were in the template namespace. But since it's not, just normal delete. --- cymru.lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 03:40, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete – Any user CAN remove warnings from their talk page! Acps110 (talk • contribs) 05:07, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above: this template badly misrepresents policy and user is indeffed. Salvio  Let's talk about it! 14:41, 7 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above this one. This is considered a test page which is not a sandbox and he's indefinitely blocked.  WAYNE  SLAM  01:44, 8 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and chuckle at Access for creating a UW about UWs. Wouldn't the user remove that UW too?  Kayau  Voting  IS   evil 09:01, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Obviously wrong. → ♠ Gƒoley ↔ Four ♣ ← 16:48, 11 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.