Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AdFlSh/Catherine driscoll

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Draftify - Moving to Draft's with a redirect, anyone in the community is welcome to continue development, if it continue to be undeveloped for a reasonable time in drafts - a subsequent discussion on how to proceed can take place. — xaosflux  Talk 16:02, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

User:AdFlSh/Catherine driscoll


I believe this is borderline for an article. Should it be deleted or can she pass GNG? Legacypac (talk) 20:41, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. Blank if inactive and not ready.  The question is for measuring against WP:PROF.  And the dichotomy is false.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:32, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * There are no real sources, and so the material is not important to keep. However, she probably meets WP:PROF.  I still think it fine blanked in userspace.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:00, 16 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as per WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:PROF. Doesn't meet the criteria listed there. -- P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:33, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Draftify – Move to Draft:Catherine Driscoll. North America1000 17:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.