Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adedpa


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk  12:14, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

User:Adedpa
User's only contribution, and from March '07. Appears to be an attempt to use a userpage as an end-run around notability guidelines. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 21:50, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - there's nothing wrong with talking about yourself on your userpage, as long as it's not promotional. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  21:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Changed to delete in light of further investigation. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  19:30, 5 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment User appears to be almost two years old (Born February 2007). WP:CHILD applies here. Mom and/or dad may have created the page, if not, user poses as child against policy. In either case it is against policy. Dr.K. (logos) 22:22, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * WP:CHILD isn't policy. –Juliancolton Tropical Cyclone  22:47, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * My mistake. Regardless, WP:CHILD is accepted practice. Dr.K. (logos) 23:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment WP:UP #5 might apply in that case; can a 2-year-old express consent? And WP:NOT certainly applies. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 23:02, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete - looks more like a personal web page. —macyes: bot 22:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment' User is clearly not the child. COPPA may or may not apply. I think the issue may be tempest in a teapot, which means I would ordinarily give it a "weak keep."  Very weak I fear. Collect (talk) 23:45, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as the page is the users only contrib and was clearly created to promote their child. John Sloan (view / chat) 01:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * That was my initial thought. They used it similarly to a birth announcement. Although cute, clearly not the place to be, it reveals information and it might lead to copycat pages. Delete. Dr.K. (logos) 17:34, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. There are places for these things, but Wikipedia is not one of them.  Graymornings (talk) 01:49, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete - yet another WP:NOT vanity page (presumably created by doting parent). -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  18:13, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.