Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aerobird/GW Userbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  keep.  —&#8288;Scotty Wong &#8288;— 23:06, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

User:Aerobird/GW Userbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

I know certain people are going to kick my ass for nominating this, but I think there’s three legitimate reasons: Dronebogus (talk) 12:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * 1: unequivocally dismissing the scientific consensus on anthropogenic climate change seems pretty divisive on an online encyclopedia dedicated to… you know, facts.
 * 2: only five people are using it, and there are less inflammatory variations on the same ubx concept
 * 3: WP:IAR, if this was another destructive pseudoscientific idea like vaccine denial it probably wouldn’t be controversial
 * Comment - I may be a bit biased because I have this on my userpage, so I won't vote on this one. However, in case there's anyone who doesn't know, there is currently an ANI discussion on Dronebogus' mass nomination of userboxes at MfD.  I'll also note that the timing of the nomination of this specific userbox is a bit suspicious given that, just a few minutes after this nomination, Dronebogus used my use of the userbox in an apparent personal attack against me. -  ZLEA  T \ C 13:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I will also point out Dronebogus' apparent contradictory reasons for deletion. The first reason calls the userbox "pretty divisive" because it is "unequivocally dismissing the scientific consensus", implying that they have a problem with all "climate change denial" userboxes, but the second reason states that "there are less inflammatory variations on the same ubx concept", which seemingly implies that they have a problem with this userbox specifically but not similar boxes.  Now I ask, why this one as opposed to any other "climate change denial" userbox? -  ZLEA  T \ C 13:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Others just say “I’m skeptical” or something akin to that Dronebogus (talk) 14:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I guess that's a fair point. - ZLEA  T \ C 15:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I removed the attack btw Dronebogus (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The timing is irrelevant and not intended to make a wp:point Dronebogus (talk) 14:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Just leave it. It’s not some Nazi userbox or some over outrageously offensive thing so it’s not worth your time to go trying to delete all of them. SK2242 (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. Wikipedia does not censor User's wrong beliefs. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Irrational, but not a violation of any policies. Scorpions13256 (talk) 01:58, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep Deleting a userbox doesn't make a differing viewpoint magically dissapear. There's nothing racist/bigoted about this viewpoint, so who cares, let it be expressed. — Mcguy15  (talk, contribs) 17:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep I don't agree with the view but since its not racist or bigoted then its okay. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 20:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.