Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Agent Smith (The Matrix)




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  Speedy Delete WP:CSD Avi (talk) 23:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Agent Smith (The Matrix)
The user insists on transcluding the article Agent Smith in his user page. This appears to violate WP:FAKEARTICLE. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 01:40, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * DELETE userpage is misleading and it's hard to assume good faith that this wasn't the user's intent. User was warned and did not respond.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nefariousski (talk • contribs) 01:53, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, transcluding an article into your User space confuses users, especially newbies, and this User is being (positively) proactive in vandal warning and reverting. If one of those users comes to Agent Smith's User page and sees the Agent Smith article there, they'll be very confused.  Woogee (talk) 02:02, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment: Hey, if a vandal gets confused that's fine by me. ;) However... -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 02:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete: Per above. Also, user has not entered discussion except through edit summaries on the user page. -- Thejadefalcon Sing your song The bird's seeds 02:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * delete this is also a fair use violation. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Block user. He was warned.  This is a behavioural problem.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 02:58, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment the transclusion needs to be removed from the userpage, especially as it results in the effective use of a non-free image in userspace. There is no need to delete the page itself.  pablo hablo. 14:14, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have altered the page, changing to rather than outright deletion. But I think that all that needs to happen is close this discussion, remove the transclusion from the page, give the user a bollocking and move on.   pablo hablo. 15:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Changing the page doesn't resolve this matter. User:Woogee told him on his Talk page that he could link to the Agent Smith page, and he reverted Woogee's edit to remove the transclusion.  The user doesn't think they're doing anything wrong.  67.51.38.51 (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Block if needed I gave him a final warning and reverted it to the link. Block if he does it again.  Deleting the page doesn't resolve the matter either, he can just recreate it.  Blocking is the only option if he pushes it that far. Gigs (talk) 21:04, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * He has replaced the page with a retired template and a statement about "bureaucratic fucks" (I guess that's us). Anyway I'm OK with the current content of the page if he leave it this way. Gigs (talk)
 * Keep - May as well, there's no violation anymore. It's not very nice being called a "bureaucratic fuck", but still... Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  22:05, 13 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk  02:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - the old version per WP:NOT and the newer version per WP:DBAD. Consider blocking the user, though if he honors his own statement ("resigned"), he won't be making any further contributions. ...but what do you think? ~B F izz 19:41, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.