Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ahmed12322/sandbox

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ✗ plicit  23:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

User:Ahmed12322/sandbox

 * – (View MfD) &#8203;

Previously deleted for WP:U5 by Fastily and re-created six minutes later with identical content. Thinly veiled advertisement as page links to a medical translation website in two places. Tendentious AfC resubmissions with no changes in between submissions. Uhai (talk) 18:01, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Generally User space and Draft space drafts are retained on the basis that they may be improved in peace and quiet to meet our criteria as articles. While this one is currently implausible as an article we should encourage editors into Wikipedia rather than discourage them from it. Obviously this is qualified by "All else being equal" 🇺🇦 Fiddle Timtrent  Faddle Talk to me 🇺🇦 18:05, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per NOTWEBHOST. NW1223&lt;Howl at me&bull;My hunts&gt; 19:21, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - Needed rejecting; has been rejected. No need to nominate drafts for deletion immediately after they are rejected.  Robert McClenon (talk) 04:24, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * It's an essay, not a draft, and these aren't allowed per WP:FORUM and WP:NOTWEBHOST. Why !vote to retain garbage? Uhai (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
 * If it was submitted via AFC, it was a draft, and it is a rejected draft. Why waste the time of nominating and deleting garbage when that is what Reject is for?  Robert McClenon (talk) 07:56, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Because it's in the user space and meets WP:U5 and was deleted for such previously. It was tendentiously resubmitted many times which is a reason for bringing drafts, especially this page if you really want to call it a draft, to MfD. Wikipedia doesn't host this content and having an AfC template on it doesn't make it immune to deletion processes. Also, this nomination occurred before the submission was rejected (in fact, prior to two more additional tendentious resubmissions). Uhai (talk) 16:40, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Question Is there any opposition of a move to draft space so U5 no longer applies? Uhai (talk) 19:32, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:DEL-REASON#4. It was a mistake to decline G11. The page is exclusively, unambiguously, and obviously promotional. This is an advertisement for "EmtranPro".—Alalch E. 22:43, 2 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Alalch E. Obvious ADMASQ, should have been G11'd. The draft has two external links, both pointing to emtranpro.com; not to mention the promotional tone and content throughout. We could of course wait 6 months and only then get rid of this... or we could do the sensible thing and nix it now. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:47, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete – Read more like advertisement, like above, it would have been nominated with G11. Toadette  (Happy holiday!) 17:13, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.