Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Akwaake22/Alcohol abuse namibia

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. JohnCD (talk) 11:56, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

User:Akwaake22/Alcohol abuse namibia


Qualifies for deletion per WP:NOTESSAY and WP:NOR. North America1000 11:28, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Associated with this: School and university projects/Polytechnic of Namibia/Information Competence, September 2011.  Harmless.  Next time please just blank.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 06:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't agree with blanking pages in other people's user spaces without a discussion. I have material in my own space which I may get around to improving one day.  It only takes a few minutes of people's time to have three or four people express their opinion that a page should be deleted, and to notify the user with an automated tool.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
 * A few minutes time multiplied by three or four people is massive overspend on these things. The nominator/blanker should assess the user's activity and problems with the page.  If your userpages were blanked, you can easily respond, and unblank in seconds from your watchlist.  Also, why would someone do that?  Do you have have essays unrelated to the project, or gross OR work in your userspace?  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete now that we are here, but blanking is preferable because it involves far less overhead, and is less confrontational and unwelcoming to the user should the user ever return. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:04, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - It seems that this was a school project which is now over. Even though this could conceivably be a notable topic, it's very unlikely that the user, who hasn't edit since, will ever return and rewrite it in factual rather than essay-like style.&mdash;Anne Delong (talk) 16:45, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.