Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alan347/XE

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete all. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 09:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)

User:Alan347/XE
Does not appear to be related to developing encyclopedic articles. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:06, 12 January 2011 (UTC)

Delete the following unstricken pages in Alan347's userspace as well. I have strucken out those pages that do not violate policy: Cunard (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * It relates to several areas in Christology, theologian Hans Urs von Balthasar, theologian Walter Kasper. I've contributed to these pages. Alan347 (talk) 22:08, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Alan347 has made several attempts to present his religious thoughts in articles, only to be deleted as original research and essays. He has consistently replaced his talk page content with his theories of biblical thought. He has also presented information inappropriately into articles, only to have his content removed, proceeding to edit war over content. He currently has over 20 additional subpages with similar content. Seriously. Enough is enough. Wikipedia is not a webhost or the place to present original research.  Cind. amuse  22:45, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This is absolutely not "indefinite" at the one month mark, nor does WP require that userspace consist of encyclopedia articles. This does not appear to attack anyone, and I tend to give a minimum of six months before requiring anything else. Collect (talk) 14:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete all per WP:NOTWEBHOST and WP:SOAP. Cunard (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * SarekofVulcan and Cindamuse, will you add a note below this comment affirming these additions if you agree. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 00:29, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I can't say I agree without going through all of them, but I know there are a couple of them that I had considered nominating after I saw what the consensus was for this one. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 03:42, 14 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment. I would agree with deleting all of them.  Cind. amuse  03:40, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete all and apply exemplary one month block. Blatant use of Wikipedia as a free host. Cluttering his user talk page with the stuff was the last straw for me. Alan, why do you keep trying? No-one will bother you at blogspot! User:Collect, what is this "one month" business? This essay by Alan is over six months old. &mdash; RHaworth 02:09, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The primary page listed was edited within the past week by the person - which I consider to be less than one month. YMMV, but practice at MfD has been to allow about 6 months before deciding something was indefinitely stored. Collect (talk) 02:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. I agree with Cunard here; it's a violation of WP:SOAP. Kayau HAPI   B-DAY   WP  13:33, 15 January 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.