Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alansohn/B. H. Carroll Theological Institute


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellany page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep ^ demon [omg plz] 18:45, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

User:Alansohn/B. H. Carroll Theological Institute
A copy of a wikipedia article from October 2006. After six months this page remains listed in all the categories due to the page's nature. If this is a work page there is no work done on it. Arbustoo 05:53, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - This appears to be an active user with >30K edits. I would like to WP:AGF and assume that they meant to do something with this and just forgot that it was here.  I'm going to nowiki the cats per After Midnight 0001 18:28, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Per After Midnight.--James, La gloria è a dio 19:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as above. Metamagician3000 09:03, 1 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nothing wrong with an archived article in user space. On the contrary, when pages fail an AfD (and even a further deletion review), one of the options is to have an admin move it to your userspace. That being so, I can hardly see how an archived article is a problem. Vassyana 04:06, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.