Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexanderwolfe

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was '''Delete. Also, unanimous other than the blocked account. Also, WP:SNOW.'''. -- Cirt (talk) 02:33, 9 June 2011 (UTC)

User:Alexanderwolfe


Userpage masquerading as an article. I believe the most recent edits were made by his publicist. Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  20:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete-- WP:FAKEARTICLE and borderlineWP:STALEDRAFT of a musician of questionable notability. -- E♴  (talk)  22:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:FAKEARTICLE. -- Klein zach  01:52, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promotional unsourced BLP WP:FAKEARTICLE. MER-C 07:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * This is not a FAKEARTICLE. This page was created by Alexander Wolfe's management and has now had references added in to support this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexanderwolfe (talk • contribs) — Alexanderwolfe (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Keep - Alexander Wolfe's page is legitimate and set up by himself and management Dean Street Studios (talk) 12:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * that is an argument for deletion, not retention According to a note posted on my talk page, "I am Alex's manager and we created this page together taking information and photos only from his approved source.... I have added in some references today along with links to provide proof of him as a releasing recording artist, and not of questionable notability. Bang Management" In other words, this has been a role account all along, here only to spam us about the subject. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete and consider salting the title against recreation. These guys seem determined to promote themselves.  --PMDrive1061 (talk) 15:27, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Smells like a FAKEARTICLE. Although I agree with the concerns above. JJ98 (Talk)  07:09, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Way too promotional a userpage for a non-genuine contributor.  With regards to the interest in making a real article, refer the author to WP:COI.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:10, 5 June 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.