Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alexis




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was blank. @harej 21:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

User:Alexis
A userfied copy of the article Alexis Rhodes that has not been edited since 2007, and the user has also been inactive since 2007. 「 ダイノ ガイ 千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. — 「 ダイノ ガイ  千？！ 」? · Talk⇒Dinoguy1000 17:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank It's probably OK to just do a bold blanking when it's the user's main page or main talk page and the user is inactive. Gigs (talk) 21:13, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank I agree with Gigs. The version here is way out of date compared to the article. I should also point out that the user has not actually edited this user page since 3 April 2006. --  Phantom Steve  ( Contact Me, My Contribs ) 18:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
 * But would blanking then get it wiped clean? It wouldn't be eligible for an author-requested CSD. —Quasirandom (talk) 20:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Criterion #U1 applies to a user page no matter whether some other editor happens to have touched it. Uncle G (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah -- gotcah. —Quasirandom (talk) 16:20, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Blank, as is appropriate for dubious material that appears long since forgotten. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 13:12, 8 September 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.