Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Aliceelisabethmay/JBA Consulting

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was  delete. The keep opinions are based on the idea that something might yet be done with this. However this author has not edited for nearly a year, and has now posted his version at JBA Consulting. There is no reason to keep this. JohnCD (talk) 17:22, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

User:Aliceelisabethmay/JBA Consulting
This a copy of a deleted article, to which no additional information was added since it's creation. It is a fake article and staledraft. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  17:02, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
 * keep someone is becoming active again on this topic at WP:FFU so it looks as if work will start again on the userspace draft. The page is not fake. New user is User:Derekhawley with their own draft at User:Derekhawley/Enter your new article name here. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep  If it were a mainspace article, my vote would be different, but for me, the level of proof for deletion in user space is higher than main space, especially as we don't know what the user has in mind for the article. --UnicornTapestry (talk) 17:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:STALEDRAFT, which states: "Userspace is not a free web host and should not be used to indefinitely host pages that look like articles, old revisions, or deleted content, or your preferred version of disputed content. Private copies of pages that are being used solely for long-term archival purposes may be subject to deletion." Because this page violates WP:STALEDRAFT and WP:NOTWEBHOST, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The nominated page has remained a stale draft since its creation at 11:42, 1 March 2010 (UTC). That the page is unreferenced and that the creator, a single-purpose account, has not edited since 3 March 2010 strengthens the reasons for deletion per WP:NOTWEBHOST.  states that "someone is becoming active on this topic at WP:FFU" and that someone has created User:Derekhawley/Enter your new article name here. I do not see how this is relevant to the fact that this page is a stale draft that violates Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  has neither used the content on this page nor expressed an interest in using the content on this page.  states that "we don't know what the user has in mind for the article". I agree, there is no evidence that the user plans to return and bring the page up to Wikipedia's verifiability standards. Because over 11 months have passed since this page was created, and because it is an abandoned stale draft, it should be deleted. Cunard (talk) 00:31, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.