Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alterego/sandbox/List of people who have said they are a god


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Keep and also blank  Keeper    76  21:25, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

User:Alterego/sandbox/List of people who have said they are a god
This is a pseudo-article in userspace; it hasn't had a serious, constructive edit in over two years. —Bkell (talk) 16:35, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See also List of people who have been considered deities. —Bkell (talk) 16:37, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * See also
 * List of people who have claimed to be Jesus
 * User:Alterego/sandbox/List of human deities
 * Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Andries/list of self-proclaimed deities
 * User:Alterego/List of people claiming to be deities timeline
 * Template:Self-proclaimed deities
 * Template:List of people who have been considered deities
 * -- Suntag  ☼  05:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Syn  ergy  00:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Blank, don't delete. The above are definately potentially useful for mainspace additions.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 12:48, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - User subpages are not meant to host permanent content that is meant to be part of the encyclopedia. -- Suntag (talk) 02:01, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Blanking preserves accessibility in case the stuff is becomes useful, and in preserving accessibility of user contributions, which often is useful. --SmokeyJoe (talk) 09:42, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Artification - I took another look at the list. I think something like Pre-20th century people widely accepted as being deities might be viable as an article. It is better than List of people who have been considered deities. I say clean it up a little (get rid of anyone living after 1900) and move the page to Pre-20th century people widely accepted as being deities. That will put it in AfDs hands, if needed. I suspect that List of people who have been considered deities eventually would be merged into "Pre-20th century people widely accepted as being deities". Articlefy seems like a good option. -- Suntag  ☼  05:10, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, in that as Suntag says, some of this material looks like it could actually be useful for articles. If this isn't an article itself, there's definitely a good article in here somewhere - we may as well keep these user subpages to use as a resource. Terraxos (talk) 00:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.