Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alvestrand/POV-history

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by the user in question (U1). BencherliteTalk 09:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

User:Alvestrand/POV-history


Appears to violate WP:POLEMIC which indicates that userpages should not contain"Material that can be viewed as attacking other editors, including the recording of perceived flaws. The compilation of factual evidence (diffs) in user subpages, for purposes such as preparing for a dispute resolution process, is permitted provided it will be used in a timely manner. " This is a very old dispute and the page has not been edited in years. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:19, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Pardon me if I missed it, but did you ask Alvestrand to consider deleting this before nominating it here? He has edited as recently as today, so there's good reason to take that step first. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:21, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * That never seems to work for me but I'll give it a shot now I guess.Beeblebrox (talk) 01:24, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * I'm here... I find that talk pages work with people who are recent editors, most of the time. The page was useful in 2009 to let me remember the details from 2006. My memory is very far from perfect, so I hate deleting notes. However, it's been a few years. I'll move this to private space (off-wiki). (A random query: how did you happen to see it?) --Alvestrand (talk) 01:57, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.