Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alvinaandfriend/Alvina And Friends




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was delete. @harej 01:46, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

User:Alvinaandfriend/Alvina And Friends
Vanity page previously deleted and editor has not edited since November of 2009, nor has the page been edited since then. If this were an article it would fall under the G2 CSD criteria I believe. ArcAngel (talk) (review) 05:55, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - It looks like the page is being used for long-term archival, as there's little work going on, and I don't know how this could possibly pass WP:N. Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  14:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I know we usually like to avoid deleting userspace drafts that have been edited within the past six months, but I think in this case we should ignore the rules. This is obviously never going to fly in the mainspace, and as such this is a disallowed use of a subpage per WP:SUB. A Stop at Willoughby (talk) 17:44, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.-- Coldplay Expért Let's talk  22:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just blank mildly inappropriate pages belonging to inactive users. No need to advertise them here.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 05:48, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete—I don't know what the page is for, but if it's a draft anything, it clearly won't have a home on Wikipedia! ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  sundries  ─╢ 14:27, 12 January 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.