Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AmericanDad86

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Keep / Edit No consensus for actual deletion, however the content is clearly not here to help build an encyclopedia, edited to. — xaosflux  Talk 16:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

User:AmericanDad86


I think this user page qualifies under WP:POLEMIC. I don't think Wikipedia should maintain a diatribe from a user who is indefinitely blocked. Liz Read! Talk! 15:05, 12 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment Interesting. I've noticed over the last few days just how much Wikipedia tries to hide from their past. --MurderByDeletionism"bang!" 16:27, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - No longer necessary obviously. SwisterTwister   talk  07:55, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep and replace all contents with the template blocked user. There is no reason to delete the page. The practise of deleting blocked users' user pages is deprecated; and there is not much precedence for doing that nowadays. 103.6.159.85 (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete not only is it unnecessary, the "I'M FAMOUS, BITCHES" schtick won't do him any favours if he ever tries to get unblocked. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.