Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Amit Kr Kushwaha/Mukteswar Temple (Murtiya)

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was Delete. — xaosflux  Talk 15:36, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

User:Amit Kr Kushwaha/Mukteswar Temple (Murtiya)

 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * (Time stamp for bot to properly relist.) North America1000 19:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

Stale draft from account that made 4 or 5 total edits. No references and not enough to build an article off. English is a little muddled (which is understandable). A TNT situation. Legacypac (talk) 16:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect - Good-faith draft, no benefit derived from deletion. Legacypac has clearly not even googled the subject, since it already has a fine article at Mukteshvara Temple, which should be the redirect target. In this context, citing TNT, which recommends deletion in order to clear the way for someone else to do it right and therefore already doesn't make any sense to apply to userspace, makes even less sense here. A2soup (talk) 08:14, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 19:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note – The draft is about a temple in Nepal, but the redirect target suggested above is about what appears to be a different temple in India. North America1000 19:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. There are a lot of templates in India and most of them are not notable. This is unsourced and if the editor returns after two and a half years, they can request restoration or just start anew since again there are no sources here. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 23:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete completely unsourced stale draft about a non-notable temple. No reason to redirect this stale userspace draft to an article about a completely different temple in a different country. Chrisw80 (talk) 22:59, 22 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.