Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AmyHarper77/sandbox/Martin Newman

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was:  delete. ‑Scottywong | [comment] || 19:32, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

User:AmyHarper77/sandbox/Martin Newman

 * – (View MfD)



Draft:Martin Newman (author) was already submitted four times, declined three times and rejected once, by three reviewers, including User:Sulfurboy. Another draft has been submitted. Although specific promotional language has been removed, the draft still consists largely of external links. The author has not made the required disclosure of conflict of interest. The draft still does not establish biographical notability. That would not be a reason to delete, but attempting an end run around Rejection is a reason, and the COI is a reason. Robert McClenon (talk) 17:22, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Draft:Martin Newman (author) and then Delete both pages. Promotion.  —SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:16, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete: Do what suggests. 🐔 Chicdat Chicken Database 11:18, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.