Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AnAbsolutelyOriginalUsername42/UCD Fencing Club




 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was keep. harej 00:06, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

User:AnAbsolutelyOriginalUsername42/UCD Fencing Club
This article was deleted twice once by AfD here and the by User:Tedder under G4: Recreation of a page that was deleted per a deletion discussion. It was userfied and as of today no work at all has been done to the article to satisfy original AfD. Per WP:NOTWEBHOST -- BigDunc  17:33, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep No reason given for deletion of the userified content. It doesn't appear offensive. Jclemens (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * So by that reasoning no article can be deleted just userfy it and then it is ok. It gets userfied to allow editors the chance to fix any problems which brought about its deletion not just a place to host it. At present it is being used merely as an archive of previously deleted content. BigDunc  18:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Unless it's defamatory, copyvio, or promotional, yes. WP:DEADLINE applies. Jclemens (talk) 21:57, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep. Although BigDunc is basically correct, it's barely been a month. Come back in another 2-3 months with no significant changes and that's another story. Beeblebrox (talk) 21:55, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Nice to know I have someone breathing down my neck... --AnAbsolutelyOriginalUsername42 (talk) 23:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep It has only been a month, user indicated that verifiable sources existed but would take time to sort through, so I think it is reasonable to give it more time as there is little harm in keeping it in the user space and potentially we could end up with a good article back in mainspace. Camw (talk) 00:05, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep At least a month is a reasonable amount of time. Not everyone has the same amount of dedication to Wikipedia with regards to time usage.--WaltCip (talk) 20:20, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - For now. If we're not seeing anything drastic by, say, April-May, delete, but keep for now, Lord Spongefrog,   (I am Czar of all Russias!)  19:04, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.