Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AnJu RaGaV/sandbox/LOVE EDITS

 __NOINDEX__
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: delete. On the general basis that the user is no longer active, was only ever here for PROMO reasons, and this title (LOVE EDITS) is the same title of one of his deleted pages (thus it is also PROMO ish). &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:01, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

User:AnJu RaGaV/sandbox/LOVE EDITS


Stale draft of inactive user, with no meaningful content or history. Was probably created by someone attempting to create a sandbox page that didn't know how to. —Compassionate727 (T·C) 14:41, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete would be G2 except for the magic word sandbox in the string. It's not a sandbox. Legacypac (talk) 16:35, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Just FYI CSD G2 explicitly doesn't apply to userspace.  Richard 0612  20:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Robert McClenon (talk) 19:57, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom, stale and incomprehensible draft.  Richard 0612  20:45, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Obviously a test preceding Shamlal Ahamed, which is far more a concern. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 21:32, 25 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep - it's a test page. What reason is there to delete a user's test page? That there is no meaningful content to anyone but the user means there's no reason to delete. &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 18:52, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
 * comment do people get points for nominating things for deletion? Why else would someone bother nominating a random test page like this?Egaoblai (talk) 21:12, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - Unless someone can explain how this page alone contributes to the goals of Wikipedia ... then this can be deleted. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:29, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * By doing what sandboxes are supposed to do -- give someone a place to experiment and learn how to contribute. How many of these pages are, alone, beneficial to Wikipedia? And what benefit is there to the project to deleting them? (obviously I am not suggesting deleting anything in your userspace, nor have I actually inspected those pages -- just making a point that userspace serves purposes beyond holding drafts of articles). &mdash; Rhododendrites  talk \\ 23:05, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Point taken. – Davey 2010 Talk 23:58, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * User sandboxes are where uses are meant to play. A downside of their main sandbox is that over the years it can be used for many inrelated things, including article drafting, and this makes for a messy edit history.  Making subpages of your main sandbox solves that problem, and so I think it should be encouraged.  The "sandbox" in the title should be read.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 23:53, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Apologies for the academic pedantry. When his mainspace self promotion is deleted, this subpage can be U5-ed.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 00:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.